Science Fiction’s Tricky Relationship with Science

There seems to a lot of discussion about the relationship between science fiction and the actual development of science of technology going the internet rounds at the moment. This relationship is not easily defined and is very complex.

There are basically two methods that technology developments. The first is by honing what you’ve got to make it bigger, smaller, more compact, whatever, but in the end more user-friendly. Then there is the discovery by serendipity. This is when someone has an insight to what s/he sees. It’s like the apple being the inspiration for Newton’s theory of gravity.

The gradual honing is controllable. The serendipity isn’t. You just can’t force it. But you can help it along. And this is where science fiction can be useful. It encourages the examining of how technology and science works. Which in turn can produce that invention through what I call the ‘blip moment’. Notice the word encourage. Serendipity cannot be forced.

But at the end of the day, you don’t need science fiction. There are other methods of making people interested in rummaging around science and technology.

Science fiction on the other hand uses the extrapolations of the honing process. Think of the miniaturisation of computers. They get smaller and smaller in size, or bigger and bigger in capability. Eventually we will have the Asimovian robots with their ‘positronic’ brains. A far cry from Leonardo da Vinci’s programmable mechanical lion, built for the French King.

Science fiction can also encourage the development of science, by warning of impending societal problems. This gives science and technology a driver to think up solutions.

The above are only a few aspects of science fiction’s relationship with science and technology development. Maybe one day I’ll get round to doing a blobogram of it all….

Advertisements

One thought on “Science Fiction’s Tricky Relationship with Science

  1. I wonder what is the most common form of technological and scientific breakthrough; serendipitous, research, or accidental?
    I agree that the relationship between science fiction and science is a complex and multi-layered one. A respectable amount of science has been inspired by science fiction and vice versa. If you were to poll the scientists and engineers in the various industries, I would wager an extremely high percentage were inspired by science fiction at an early age.

    I’m reminded of an Albert Einstein quote.
    “Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand.”

    Good post!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s